Dufrene v. Dufrene

149 So. 889
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 5, 1933·No. No. 1201.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ELLIOTT, Judge.

In this case the record contains no brief filed by the defendant-appellant. There is an appeal bond, but no order granting an appeal, no copy of the minutes, no certificate that the record is complete.

There is no motion to dismiss, but an order of appeal is jurisdictional, and when there is none we can but act ex officio and dismiss the appeal. Gagneaux v. Desonier, 104 La. 648, 29 So. 282; Walker v. Parish of Tangipahoa, 111 La. 321, 35 So. 585; Sammons v. N. O. Ry. & Light Co., 143 La. 734, 79 So. 320; Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Co., 165 La. 563, 115 So. 752; Wiley v. Ballio & Perry, 171 La. 411, 131 So. 192.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dufrene v. Dufrene, 149 So. 889 (La. Ct. App. 1933).

149 So. 889 (Dufrene v. Dufrene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirsch v. Kirsch
180 So. 3d 417 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
Voelkel v. State
671 So. 2d 478 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)