Dufrene v. Dufrene
This text of 149 So. 889 (Dufrene v. Dufrene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the record contains no brief filed by the defendant-appellant. There is an appeal bond, but no order granting an appeal, no copy of the minutes, no certificate that the record is complete.
There is no motion to dismiss, but an order of appeal is jurisdictional, and when there is none we can but act ex officio and dismiss the appeal. Gagneaux v. Desonier, 104 La. 648, 29 So. 282; Walker v. Parish of Tangipahoa, 111 La. 321, 35 So. 585; Sammons v. N. O. Ry. & Light Co., 143 La. 734, 79 So. 320; Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Co., 165 La. 563, 115 So. 752; Wiley v. Ballio & Perry, 171 La. 411, 131 So. 192.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 So. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dufrene-v-dufrene-lactapp-1933.