Dufour v. Silsby

411 A.2d 1391, 1980 Me. LEXIS 521
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dufour v. Silsby. Read the opinion of the Court — 1979 Me. LEXIS 732
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 3, 1980·Published

Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing and reconsideration must be dismissed. Tyson v. Whitaker & Son, Inc., Me., 411 A.2d 389 (1980); Ginn v. Penobscot Co., Me., 342 A.2d 270, 275 (1975). We have reviewed the instant case to determine whether it falls within any of the limited exceptions recognized in those cases, and have concluded that it does not. Moreover, there is no occasion for any clarification of this Court’s opinion in support of its mandate.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dufour v. Silsby, 411 A.2d 1391, 1980 Me. LEXIS 521 (Me. 1980).

411 A.2d 1391 (Dufour v. Silsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ginn v. Penobscot Company
342 A.2d 270 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1975)
Tyson v. Whitaker & Son, Inc.
411 A.2d 389 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)