Dufield v. Warden

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 8, 1993·No. 93-1841·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


December 8, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________

No. 93-1841

THOMAS V. DUFIELD,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

WARDEN NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON,

Respondent, Appellee.

__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

___________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________

___________________

Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Mark D. Attorri,
__________________ ________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

__________________

__________________

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record on appeal
___________

and affirm the judgment of the district court essentially for

the reasons stated in the order, dated July 7, 1993.

Affirmed.
_________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dufield v. Warden, (1st Cir. 1993).

Dufield v. Warden (Dufield v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.