Duffy v. Work
This text of 15 N.Y.S. 143 (Duffy v. Work) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint entered upon the findings and decision of a judge at special term. At the trial both parties gave evidence. A careful examination of the papers presented fails to disclose any ground which calls for a reversal of the judgment. The burden of establishing his cause of action by a fair preponderance of evidence was not satisfactorily borne by the plaintiff at the trial. If the second conveyance is considered to have been given as security, and so a mortgage, it would not help the plaintiff’s case, as by his conduct he has es-topped himself from claiming that the sale to Sexton was a conversion; for he took service to find a purchaser, and when unsuccessful in his efforts accepted $1,000 to give possession to a purchaser. The judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.Y.S. 143, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-work-superctny-1891.