Duffy v. Wetzler

719 N.E.2d 917, 93 N.Y.2d 1035, 697 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2894
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 16, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 719 N.E.2d 917 (Duffy v. Wetzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duffy v. Wetzler, 719 N.E.2d 917, 93 N.Y.2d 1035, 697 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2894 (N.Y. 1999).

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied appellants’ cross motion to amend the complaint and dismissed appellants’ appeal from so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied appellants’ motion for reargument, dismissed, [1036]*1036without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such part of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 N.E.2d 917, 93 N.Y.2d 1035, 697 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-wetzler-ny-1999.