Duffy v. Tout

Oregon Supreme Court

Duffy v. Tout

56 P. 1134, 32 Or. 599, 1898 Ore. LEXIS 74

DecidedMarch 1, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 56 P. 1134 (Duffy v. Tout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duffy v. Tout, 56 P. 1134, 32 Or. 599, 1898 Ore. LEXIS 74 (Or. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

[600]*600Action by Thos. and Michael Duffy against Geo. L. and Ellen Tout in a justice’s court to recover $32.10. On a trial, there was a judgment for defendants for $2.90 and $40.00 costs. In the circuit court, plaintiff had judgment for $17.10, from which defendants appeal on the ground that there was no proper service of the notice of the appeal to the circuit court. The cause coming on regularly for hearing, the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed, no trial fee having been paid, and no one appearing for appellants. No opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[600]*600Action by Thos. and Michael Duffy against Geo. L. and Ellen Tout in a justice’s court to recover $32.10. On a trial, there was a judgment for defendants for $2.90 and $40.00 costs. In the circuit court, plaintiff had judgment for $17.10, from which defendants appeal on the ground that there was no proper service of the notice of the appeal to the circuit court. The cause coming on regularly for hearing, the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed, no trial fee having been paid, and no one appearing for appellants. No opinion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 P. 1134, 32 Or. 599, 1898 Ore. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-tout-or-1898.