Duffy v. . Phipps

109 S.E. 629, 182 N.C. 778, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duffy v. . Phipps. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 N.C. 313
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 7, 1921·Published

Opinion

Pee CuRiam.

From a perusal of the record it appears that the cause has been tried in accordance with our former interpretation and construction of the contract of sale entered into between the parties. The case was here before on appeal from a judgment overruling the defendant’s demurrer; and we deem it unnecessary to repeat our previous holding, which has now become the law of the case. Public Service Co. v. Power Co., 181 N. C., 356; Lewis v. Nunn, ante, 119.

After a full investigation of the defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error, we have discovered no sufficient reason for disturbing the result.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duffy v. . Phipps, 109 S.E. 629, 182 N.C. 778, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 336 (N.C. 1921).

109 S.E. 629 (Duffy v. . Phipps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.
107 S.E. 226 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)