Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio
This text of Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio (Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USOVL-SUINET DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: |/2//2e2
AMY CLAIRE DUFFY, Petitioner, y No. 20-CV-336 (RA) LYDELL JEWELRY DESIGN STUDIO, ORDER LLC, GLOBAL ACCESSORIES GROUP, LLC, AND JOHN M. HIGGINS, Respondent.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. On January 15, 2020, Petitioner filed the operative petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. Petitioner has not yet docketed an affidavit of service. Confirmation proceedings for arbitration awards must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). It is hereby: ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which he intends to support his petition for confirmation by February 5, 2020. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on March 4, 2020. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on March 11, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2020 New York, New York Ronnié Abrams United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-lydell-jewelry-design-studio-nysd-2020.