Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio

S.D. New York

Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 21, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00336·Unknown

Opinion

USOVL-SUINET DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: |/2//2e2

AMY CLAIRE DUFFY, Petitioner, y No. 20-CV-336 (RA) LYDELL JEWELRY DESIGN STUDIO, ORDER LLC, GLOBAL ACCESSORIES GROUP, LLC, AND JOHN M. HIGGINS, Respondent.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. On January 15, 2020, Petitioner filed the operative petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. Petitioner has not yet docketed an affidavit of service. Confirmation proceedings for arbitration awards must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). It is hereby: ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which he intends to support his petition for confirmation by February 5, 2020. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on March 4, 2020. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on March 11, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2020 New York, New York Ronnié Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USOVL-SUINET DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: |/2//2e2

AMY CLAIRE DUFFY, Petitioner, y No. 20-CV-336 (RA) LYDELL JEWELRY DESIGN STUDIO, ORDER LLC, GLOBAL ACCESSORIES GROUP, LLC, AND JOHN M. HIGGINS, Respondent.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. On January 15, 2020, Petitioner filed the operative petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. Petitioner has not yet docketed an affidavit of service. Confirmation proceedings for arbitration awards must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). It is hereby: ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which he intends to support his petition for confirmation by February 5, 2020. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on March 4, 2020. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on March 11, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2020 New York, New York Ronnié Abrams United States District Judge

Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio (Duffy v. Lydell Jewelry Design Studio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related