Duffy v. Luther Banks

15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12082

This text of 15 A.D.2d 663 (Duffy v. Luther Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duffy v. Luther Banks, 15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

[664]*664In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that plaintiffs be allowed to serve the proposed supplemental complaint and bill of particulars upon the conditions stated (cf. Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc., 298 N. Y. 62, 67; Wagner v. Mittendorf, 232 N. Y. 481; Matter of Dickerson v. Essex County, 2 A D 2d 516, 519-520; Brewster v. Brewster Co., 138 App. Div. 139, 140). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.
80 N.E.2d 334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Wagner v. . Mittendorf
134 N.E. 539 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Brewster v. F. G. Brewster Co.
138 A.D. 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 663, 223 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-luther-banks-nyappdiv-1962.