Duffy v. Hinkley

98 N.W. 215, 120 Wis. 492, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 88
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 98 N.W. 215 (Duffy v. Hinkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duffy v. Hinkley, 98 N.W. 215, 120 Wis. 492, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 88 (Wis. 1904).

Opinion

Maeshall, J.

It does not seem advisable to discuss tbe evidence in tbis case. Tbe questions raised all relate to whether tbe findings are warranted by tbe evidence. The-record has been carefully examined. We are unable to perceive that sucb findings are against tbe clear .preponderance of tbe evidence, and therefore, by familiar rules, tbe judgment must be affirmed.

By the Gourt. — So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 N.W. 215, 120 Wis. 492, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-hinkley-wis-1904.