Duffy v. Flagg
876 A.2d 1201, 274 Conn. 909, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 278
This text of 876 A.2d 1201 (Duffy v. Flagg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Duffy v. Flagg, 876 A.2d 1201, 274 Conn. 909, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 278 (Colo. 2005).
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 484 (AC 24460), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s ruling excluding certain evidence regarding the issue of informed consent?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jim P. Benge, M.D. and Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group PLLC v. Lauren Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Duffy v. Flagg
905 A.2d 15 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
876 A.2d 1201, 274 Conn. 909, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-flagg-conn-2005.