Duffy v. Dusenbury

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Duffy v. Dusenbury

99 N.Y.S. 1138

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 99 N.Y.S. 1138 (Duffy v. Dusenbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duffy v. Dusenbury, 99 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question upon which we are asked to reverse the judgment is that it is based upon a verdict which is against the weight of evidence. While .the trial disclosed facts which militate against thé defense, and while perhaps a contrary verdict would have been more acceptable to us, the one rendered finds such support in the evidence that it should not be disturbed. Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question upon which we are asked to reverse the judgment is that it is based upon a verdict which is against the weight of evidence. While .the trial disclosed facts which militate against thé defense, and while perhaps a contrary verdict would have been more acceptable to us, the one rendered finds such support in the evidence that it should not be disturbed. Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 N.Y.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-dusenbury-nyappterm-1906.