Duffy v. Boehringer
237 A.D. 877
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 237 A.D. 877 (Duffy v. Boehringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Duffy v. Boehringer, 237 A.D. 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; O’Malley and Sherman, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and denial of the motion on the ground that the defendants have presented triable issues under the authority of Pimpinello v. Swift & Co. (253 N. Y. 159).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.
170 N.E. 530 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffy-v-boehringer-nyappdiv-1933.