Duffield v. Ingraham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Duffield v. Ingraham

1912 OK 704, 128 P. 111, 35 Okla. 11, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 502

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 16, 1912

Docket2080

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1912 OK 704 (Duffield v. Ingraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duffield v. Ingraham, 1912 OK 704, 128 P. 111, 35 Okla. 11, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 502 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Pawnee county. Subsequent to the denial of the motion for new trial, November 3, 1909, and during the time for service of the case-made, Judge PI. T. Conley, the trial judge, died. Thereafter the case-made was settled by County Judge N. E. Mc-Neill' and filed in this court. After the rendition of the case of J. W. Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill Co., 27 Okla. 600, 112 Pac. 1119, decided on the 16th day of 'November, 19Í0, and invoking the rule therein laid down, counsel for plaintiff in error presented evidence showing the death of the trial judge on February 2-6, 1910. Under the authority of the above case, there *12 fore, the cause will be remanded to the trial court, with instructions to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered.and grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

PIA YES and KANE, JJ., concur; TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Pawnee county. Subsequent to the denial of the motion for new trial, November 3, 1909, and during the time for service of the case-made, Judge PI. T. Conley, the trial judge, died. Thereafter the case-made was settled by County Judge N. E. Mc-Neill' and filed in this court. After the rendition of the case of J. W. Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill Co., 27 Okla. 600, 112 Pac. 1119, decided on the 16th day of 'November, 19Í0, and invoking the rule therein laid down, counsel for plaintiff in error presented evidence showing the death of the trial judge on February 2-6, 1910. Under the authority of the above case, there *12 fore, the cause will be remanded to the trial court, with instructions to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered.and grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

PIA YES and KANE, JJ., concur; TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 704, 128 P. 111, 35 Okla. 11, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffield-v-ingraham-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack