Duffey v. State

629 So. 2d 1115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 186, 1994 WL 12415
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1994·No. No. 93-2069·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant William J. Duffey’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, with the exception of that portion of the trial court’s order which upholds the imposition of a $500 public defender’s lien. See Kirshner v. State, 533 So.2d 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). In this regard, we vacate that portion of the trial court’s order and remand this cause either for attachment of the portions of the record refuting Duffey’s contention that he did not receive notice of and a hearing regarding the imposition of that lien, or for compliance with the notice and hearing requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1) and section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1993).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part;' REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duffey v. State, 629 So. 2d 1115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 186, 1994 WL 12415 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

629 So. 2d 1115 (Duffey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLeod v. State
645 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)