Duffell v. Poe
This text of 389 S.E.2d 285 (Duffell v. Poe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In her complaint, plaintiff filed claims against defendants Alice W. Poe and Summit Savings Bank. Defendant Alice W. Poe filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant Summit [664]*664Savings Bank filed an answer, and the record before us discloses no final judgment has been entered with respect to plaintiff’s claims against defendant Summit Savings Bank. Thus, the order appealed from adjudicates “fewer than all of the claims or parties,” and plaintiff’s appeal will be dismissed. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b); Thompson v. Newman, 74 N.C. App. 597, 328 S.E.2d 597 (1985).
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 S.E.2d 285, 97 N.C. App. 663, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffell-v-poe-ncctapp-1990.