Duffell v. Poe

389 S.E.2d 285, 97 N.C. App. 663, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 213
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 20, 1990
DocketNo. 8911SC518
StatusPublished

This text of 389 S.E.2d 285 (Duffell v. Poe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duffell v. Poe, 389 S.E.2d 285, 97 N.C. App. 663, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 213 (N.C. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

In her complaint, plaintiff filed claims against defendants Alice W. Poe and Summit Savings Bank. Defendant Alice W. Poe filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant Summit [664]*664Savings Bank filed an answer, and the record before us discloses no final judgment has been entered with respect to plaintiff’s claims against defendant Summit Savings Bank. Thus, the order appealed from adjudicates “fewer than all of the claims or parties,” and plaintiff’s appeal will be dismissed. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b); Thompson v. Newman, 74 N.C. App. 597, 328 S.E.2d 597 (1985).

Dismissed.

Judges Johnson and Phillips concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Newman
328 S.E.2d 597 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 S.E.2d 285, 97 N.C. App. 663, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duffell-v-poe-ncctapp-1990.