Duffee v. Call

123 Mass. 318, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 275
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 17, 1877·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

If a writ duly served is not entered, the defendant, upon appearing pursuant to the summons served upon him and filing a complaint at the first term, is entitled to judgment for his costs. Gen. Sts. e. 120, § 12; c. 129, § 9. Gilbreth v. Brown, 15 Mass. 178, 180. Lombard v. Oliver, 5 Gray, 8. Cardival v. Smith, 109 Mass. 158, 160. And a person summoned as trustee of the principal defends nt has the like right. Gen. Sts. e. 129, § 9. Brown v. Seymour, 1 Pick. 32. The filing of a trustee’s answer, in an action which had been discontinued by the plaintiff’s failing to enter it, was a nullity, and did not waive or affect the right of the trustee to file a complaint for costs at the term at which she had been summoned to appear.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duffee v. Call, 123 Mass. 318, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 275 (Mass. 1877).

123 Mass. 318 (Duffee v. Call) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whiting v. Houghton
117 N.E. 825 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Johnson v. Reed
136 Mass. 421 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)