Dues v. Human Rights Commission
This text of 18 Ct. Cl. 36 (Dues v. Human Rights Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.
Claimant seeks reimbursement for legal services rendered to respondent when he served as a hearing examiner for the respondent State agency. The invoices for the services were not paid in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. The respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim and states that there were sufficient funds in the appropriate fiscal year with which the claim could have been paid.
In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount sought.
Award of $46,600.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ct. Cl. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dues-v-human-rights-commission-wvctcl-1990.