Dues v. Human Rights Commission

West Virginia Court of Claims

Dues v. Human Rights Commission

18 Ct. Cl. 36

West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided January 19, 1990·No. CC-89-423·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks reimbursement for legal services rendered to respondent when he served as a hearing examiner for the respondent State agency. The invoices for the services were not paid in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. The respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim and states that there were sufficient funds in the appropriate fiscal year with which the claim could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount sought.

Award of $46,600.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks reimbursement for legal services rendered to respondent when he served as a hearing examiner for the respondent State agency. The invoices for the services were not paid in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. The respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim and states that there were sufficient funds in the appropriate fiscal year with which the claim could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount sought.

Award of $46,600.00.

Dues v. Human Rights Commission, 18 Ct. Cl. 36 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

18 Ct. Cl. 36 (Dues v. Human Rights Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.