Duerr v. Duerr

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Duerr v. Duerr

191 So. 3d 804, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 182, 2015 WL 4602386

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 31, 2015

Docket2121086

StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 3d 804 (Duerr v. Duerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duerr v. Duerr, 191 So. 3d 804, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 182, 2015 WL 4602386 (Ala. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This court affirmed, without an opinion, those portions .of a judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) ordering Andrew Arthur Duerr (“the father”) to pay Anne Marie Duerr (“the mother”) postminority educational support for the parties’ daughter, N.D., and reinstating the father’s periodic-alimony obligation. Duerr v. Duerr, 191 So.3d 800 (Ala.Civ.App.2014). This court’s judgment has been reversed in part, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Duerr, 191 So.3d 801 (Ala.2015). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed.insofar as it awarded the mother postminority educational support for N.D., and the cause is remanded to the trial court for that court to enter a judgment consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This court affirmed, without an opinion, those portions .of a judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) ordering Andrew Arthur Duerr (“the father”) to pay Anne Marie Duerr (“the mother”) postminority educational support for the parties’ daughter, N.D., and reinstating the father’s periodic-alimony obligation. Duerr v. Duerr, 191 So.3d 800 (Ala.Civ.App.2014). This court’s judgment has been reversed in part, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Duerr, 191 So.3d 801 (Ala.2015). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed.insofar as it awarded the mother postminority educational support for N.D., and the cause is remanded to the trial court for that court to enter a judgment consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 So. 3d 804, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 182, 2015 WL 4602386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duerr-v-duerr-alacivapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack