Duer v. Dwyer

13 A. 225, 49 N.J.L. 695, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 10
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 A. 225 (Duer v. Dwyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duer v. Dwyer, 13 A. 225, 49 N.J.L. 695, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 10 (N.J. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment below in this case should be reversed.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Parker, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Paterson. 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodcock v. Dennis
199 A. 845 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1938)
Ex Rel. Reinhart v. Callahan
229 P. 702 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A. 225, 49 N.J.L. 695, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duer-v-dwyer-nj-1887.