Duer v. Dwyer

13 A. 225, 49 N.J.L. 695, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 10
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment below in this case should be reversed.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Parker, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Paterson. 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duer v. Dwyer, 13 A. 225, 49 N.J.L. 695, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 10 (N.J. 1887).

13 A. 225 (Duer v. Dwyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodcock v. Dennis
199 A. 845 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1938)
Ex Rel. Reinhart v. Callahan
229 P. 702 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1924)