Dueno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dueno v. State

988 So. 2d 1192, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12172, 2008 WL 3286168

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 2008·No. No. 1D07-0849·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record did not reveal reversible error, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. Although the written judgment reflects that appellant was convicted of a life felony, the offense is a first-degree felony. The trial court is directed to correct the judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

KAHN, LEWIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record did not reveal reversible error, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. Although the written judgment reflects that appellant was convicted of a life felony, the offense is a first-degree felony. The trial court is directed to correct the judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

KAHN, LEWIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Dueno v. State, 988 So. 2d 1192, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12172, 2008 WL 3286168 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

988 So. 2d 1192 (Dueno v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related