Duemler v. McCabe

Customs and Patent Appeals

Duemler v. McCabe

69 F.2d 660, 21 C.C.P.A. 936, 1934 CCPA LEXIS 33

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedMarch 19, 1934

DocketNo. 3167

StatusPublished

This text of 69 F.2d 660 (Duemler v. McCabe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duemler v. McCabe, 69 F.2d 660, 21 C.C.P.A. 936, 1934 CCPA LEXIS 33 (ccpa 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per ov/riam.

A petition for rehearing has been filed herein in which it is alleged that certain misstatements of fact were made in our opinion filed December 30, 1933. While it appears, on reexamination of the matter, that certain inaccuracies of expression occur therein, these do not in any way affect the merits or the correctness of the conclusion originally reached by us. The petition for rehearing is, therefore, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per ov/riam.

A petition for rehearing has been filed herein in which it is alleged that certain misstatements of fact were made in our opinion filed December 30, 1933. While it appears, on reexamination of the matter, that certain inaccuracies of expression occur therein, these do not in any way affect the merits or the correctness of the conclusion originally reached by us. The petition for rehearing is, therefore, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 F.2d 660, 21 C.C.P.A. 936, 1934 CCPA LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duemler-v-mccabe-ccpa-1934.