Dueger v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc. Village of Lloyd Harbor

96 A.D.2d 905, 466 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19515
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 22, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 905 (Dueger v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc. Village of Lloyd Harbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dueger v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc. Village of Lloyd Harbor, 96 A.D.2d 905, 466 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor denying the petitioners’ application for an area variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated September 23, 1982, which (1) annulled the board’s determination and (2) directed that the area variance be granted. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Although a grant of the variance in issue here would have constituted an appropriate exercise of discretion by the zoning board of appeals, we cannot say that on this record the board’s denial of the variance was arbitrary, capricious or unsupported by substantial evidence. Indeed, the primary practical difficulty relied on by the petitioners on this appeal is the fact that they will lose $15,000 if the variance is denied. Since it does seem possible to solve petitioners’ dilemma by moving the deck in question so that it complies with the zoning ordinance, we are constrained to reverse and reinstate the board’s denial of the variance. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Piekut v. Martin
266 A.D.2d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Lynch v. Trotta
264 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Jones v. Board of Appeals on Zoning
262 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Berbenich v. Schoenfeld
149 A.D.2d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Rottenberg v. Edwards
103 A.D.2d 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 905, 466 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dueger-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-of-the-inc-village-of-lloyd-harbor-nyappdiv-1983.