Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Noyes

21 N.Y.S. 341, 29 Abb. N. Cas. 115
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 341 (Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Noyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Noyes, 21 N.Y.S. 341, 29 Abb. N. Cas. 115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

BEACH, J.

I think the following adjudications support this application: Kraft v. Dingee, 38 Hun, 345; Childs v. Tuttle, 48 Hun, 228; Asylum v. Roosevelt, 35 Hun, 501. The averment in the complaint that dealers refused to buy plaintiff’s goods because of defendants’ action is in the nature of an allegation of special damages. Motion granted for specifications of names and addresses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.Y.S. 341, 29 Abb. N. Cas. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dueber-watch-case-manufacturing-co-v-noyes-nysupct-1892.