Dudsak v. Koester

Superior Court of Delaware·Decided October 1, 2024·No. N23C-08-135 FJJ·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY Joanne Dudsak and Kelly Anne Muscle, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) C.A. No.: N23C-08-135 FJJ )

Christopher Koester, Larissa Jones and ) New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. Co., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

1. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether

plaintiffs may introduce at trial as part to their special damages those amounts paid by New Jersey Manufacturers pursuant to a PIP policy issued in New Jersey covering plaintiffs.

2. In a related Court of Chancery action the Court has just issued a decision in Allstate Insurance Company v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company vacating a subrogation award in favor of NJM against Allstate the insurance carrier for the defendants in this case.

3. It is well settled Delaware law that an out of state plaintiff is not subject to the evidentiary strictures of 21 Del. C. §2118 (h).1

1 Reed v. Hoffecker, 616 A.2d 835 (Del. 1992).

4. Plaintiffs may introduce special damages even if some of those damages were paid by NJM under the NJM NJ PIP policy.

5. Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.

IT SO ORDERED this 1st day of October, 2024.

/s/ Francis J. Jones, Jr.

Francis J. Jones, Jr., Judge

cc: File & Serve Xpress

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dudsak v. Koester, (Del. Ct. App. 2024).

Dudsak v. Koester (Dudsak v. Koester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Read v. Hoffecker
616 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1992)