Dudley v. WCAB
507 A.2d 388, 510 Pa. 283
This text of 507 A.2d 388 (Dudley v. WCAB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dudley v. WCAB, 507 A.2d 388, 510 Pa. 283 (Pa. 1986).
Opinion
Eugene DUDLEY, Appellee,
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD and Township of Marple, Appellants.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
William J. McKee, Philadelphia, for appellants.
Howard Richard, Michael Paul, Leonard Tenaglia, Media, for Eugene Dudley.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
*284 ORDER OF COURT
PER CURIAM.
Order of Commonwealth Court affirmed.
FLAHERTY and HUTCHINSON, JJ., note their dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dudley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
507 A.2d 388 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
507 A.2d 388, 510 Pa. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-v-wcab-pa-1986.