Dudley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dudley v. State

327 S.W.3d 19, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504, 2010 WL 4449090

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 9, 2010

DocketWD 71417

StatusPublished

This text of 327 S.W.3d 19 (Dudley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dudley v. State, 327 S.W.3d 19, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504, 2010 WL 4449090 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Avin Dudley appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Dudley claims that the trial court erred in denying an evidentiary hearing, because he alleged facts which if true would entitle him to relief. Dudley maintains that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to call an alibi witness at trial. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Avin Dudley appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Dudley claims that the trial court erred in denying an evidentiary hearing, because he alleged facts which if true would entitle him to relief. Dudley maintains that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to call an alibi witness at trial. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 S.W.3d 19, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504, 2010 WL 4449090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack