Dudley v. Horn

21 Ala. 379
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

— Tbe declaration alleges, that Elizabeth Horn, wife of Michael Horn, falsely and maliciously charged tbe plaintiff in error with beating bis wife, so that be made her miscarry, and contains no innuendo explanatory of tbe words. Tbe ruling of tbe court below, in sustaining a demurrer to this declaration, is tbe point presented by tbe assignment of errors.

Tbe words charged in tbe declaration do not, of themselves, and without any innuendo, amount to more than a charge that tbe plaintiff bad committed an assault and battery on bis wife. Tbe speaking of such words is not actionable. Skinner v. White, 1 Dev. & Bat. 473; Andres v. Koppenheafer, 4 S. & R. 261.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dudley v. Horn, 21 Ala. 379 (Ala. 1852).

21 Ala. 379 (Dudley v. Horn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cottrell v. NAT. COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASS'N
975 So. 2d 306 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)
Brown v. W.R.M.A. Broadcasting Company
238 So. 2d 540 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)
Shaw v. Killingsworth
106 So. 138 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Heath v. Devaughn
37 Ala. 677 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1861)
Smith v. Gaffard
31 Ala. 45 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)