Dudley v. . Dudley

14 S.E.2d 787, 219 N.C. 765, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 144
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 31, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.E.2d 787 (Dudley v. . Dudley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dudley v. . Dudley, 14 S.E.2d 787, 219 N.C. 765, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 144 (N.C. 1941).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff resides in Alamance County; the defendant in Wilson County. The action is for alimony without divorce under O. S., 1667. The question presented is one of venue.

The defendant says the cause of action arose in Wilson County and is to be tried there according to the clear terms of the statute giving the right. The plaintiff says the cause of action arose in Alamance County, and further that she now resides there.

In an action of this kind, i.e., one for alimony without divorce, the statute provides that “the wife may institute an action in the Superior Court of the county in which the cause of action arose,” but the venue, thus prescribed, is not exclusive, if either the plaintiff or the defendant reside in another county at the commencement of the action, C. S., 469.

*766 Under the pertinent decisions it would seem that the motion was properly denied. Rector v. Rector, 186 N. C., 618, 120 S. E., 195; Miller v. Miller, 205 N. C., 753, 172 S. E., 493.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rector v. . Rector
120 S.E. 195 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Miller v. . Miller
172 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.E.2d 787, 219 N.C. 765, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-v-dudley-nc-1941.