Dudley v. Dudley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dudley v. Dudley

551 So. 2d 1268, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2629, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6318, 1989 WL 135531

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2622

StatusPublished

This text of 551 So. 2d 1268 (Dudley v. Dudley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dudley v. Dudley, 551 So. 2d 1268, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2629, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6318, 1989 WL 135531 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The parties have raised numerous challenges concerning the property division and alimony and child support awards set forth in the final judgment. We find no abuse of discretion with respect to any of the issues raised, except the provision making the husband responsible for payment of the past due mortgage payment and late charges on the marital home.

Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the final judgment requiring the husband to pay the mortgage arrearage, and remand with directions to delete this provision from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. In every other respect, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOOTH, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The parties have raised numerous challenges concerning the property division and alimony and child support awards set forth in the final judgment. We find no abuse of discretion with respect to any of the issues raised, except the provision making the husband responsible for payment of the past due mortgage payment and late charges on the marital home.

Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the final judgment requiring the husband to pay the mortgage arrearage, and remand with directions to delete this provision from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. In every other respect, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOOTH, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 So. 2d 1268, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2629, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6318, 1989 WL 135531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-v-dudley-fladistctapp-1989.