Dudley v. Board of Com'rs

103 F. 209, 43 C.C.A. 184, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3858
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 29, 1900·No. No. 1,398·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

A motion is made to dismiss the writ of error in this case on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the question it presents. In the court below, the jurisdiction of the circuit court was challenged, and was decided in favor of the defendant. As that disposed of the case, the plaintiff should have had the question of jurisdiction certified, and should have taken a writ of error directly to the supreme court. He had that right, and, as, he had the absolute right to a review of this question in the supreme court, he had no right to a review of it in this court. The motion to dismiss the writ is granted upon the authority of Evans-Snider-Buel Co. v. McCaskill (C. C. A.) 101 Fed. 658, and U. S. v. Jahn, 155 U. S. 109, 114, 15 Sup. Ct. 39, 39 L. Ed. 87.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dudley v. Board of Com'rs, 103 F. 209, 43 C.C.A. 184, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3858 (8th Cir. 1900).

103 F. 209 (Dudley v. Board of Com'rs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Blaine County
252 F. 548 (Eighth Circuit, 1918)
Viquesney v. Allen
131 F. 21 (Fourth Circuit, 1904)
Excelsior Wooden-Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.
109 F. 497 (Ninth Circuit, 1901)