Dudley Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 2015
Docket06-15-00045-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Dudley Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc. (Dudley Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dudley Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00045-CV

DUDLEY CONSTRUCTION, LTD., RICHARD MARK DUDLEY, AND HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants

V.

ACT PIPE & SUPPLY, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 12-000281-CV-361

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER

Court reporter Felix Thompson recorded the trial proceedings in appellate cause number

06-15-00045-CV, styled Dudley Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire

Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc., trial court cause number 12-000281-CV-361, on

appeal from the 361st Judicial District Court of Brazos County, Texas. The reporter’s record was

originally due in this matter on July 31, 2015. That deadline was extended twice on Thompson’s

requests, resulting in the most recent due date of September 30, 2015. Thompson has now filed a

third request seeking an additional thirty-day extension of the filing deadline.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The

Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely

filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules,

we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of

time.

Therefore, we overrule Thompson’s third request for an extension of the filing deadline

and order him to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-15-00045-CV, styled Dudley

Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe &

Supply, Inc., trial court cause number 12-000281-CV-361, on appeal from the 361st Judicial

District Court of Brazos County, Texas, to be received by this Court no later than the close of

business on Friday, October 30, 2015.

2 If the reporter’s record is not received by October 30, we warn Thompson that we may

begin contempt proceedings and order him to demonstrate why he should not be held in contempt

of this Court for failing to obey its order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 20, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dudley Construction, LTD., Richard Mark Dudley, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-construction-ltd-richard-mark-dudley-and-hartford-fire-insurance-texapp-2015.