Dudley C. Harbold v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Dudley C. Harbold v. United States

325 F.2d 1021

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 8, 1964

Docket7489_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 325 F.2d 1021 (Dudley C. Harbold v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dudley C. Harbold v. United States, 325 F.2d 1021 (10th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner in this proceeding to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was tried and convicted for unlawful possession of narcotics. The judgment was affirmed on appeal, 10 Cir., 255 F.2d 202. The trial court denied relief without a hearing on the grounds that the petition when examined in the light of the transcript of the proceedings on direct appeal presented no new grounds for granting relief. Out of an abundance of precaution an appeal in forma pauperis was granted and counsel was appointed. Counsel has filed a memorandum brief in which he states that the matters presented now under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 were conclusively resolved in the direct appeal.

Upon consideration of the record and files in the ease, we agree with the trial court. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner in this proceeding to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was tried and convicted for unlawful possession of narcotics. The judgment was affirmed on appeal, 10 Cir., 255 F.2d 202. The trial court denied relief without a hearing on the grounds that the petition when examined in the light of the transcript of the proceedings on direct appeal presented no new grounds for granting relief. Out of an abundance of precaution an appeal in forma pauperis was granted and counsel was appointed. Counsel has filed a memorandum brief in which he states that the matters presented now under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 were conclusively resolved in the direct appeal.

Upon consideration of the record and files in the ease, we agree with the trial court. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 F.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudley-c-harbold-v-united-states-ca10-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack