Dude v. Smith
This text of 187 S.E.2d 664 (Dude v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, a prisoner at Georgia State Prison, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus against the prison warden. His application alleged violation of certain of his constitutional rights which he also alleged he had not waived.
At the hearing in the trial court the appellant’s testimony was in direct conflict with the written transcript of what occurred in the convicting court at the time appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of voluntary manslaughter.
We have reviewed the record and transcript very carefully, and we do not find, as the trial court did not, any violation of the appellant’s constitutional rights. The denial of the application below was proper.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 S.E.2d 664, 228 Ga. 707, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dude-v-smith-ga-1972.