Duddleston v. Grills

Supreme Court

Duddleston v. Grills

385 U.S. 455

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 10, 1967·No. 370·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U. S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U. S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

Duddleston v. Grills, 385 U.S. 455 (1967).

Pincite

385 U.S. 455 (Duddleston v. Grills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related