Dudas v. Fischer

68 A.D.3d 1772, 890 N.Y.2d 850

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1772 (Dudas v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dudas v. Fischer, 68 A.D.3d 1772, 890 N.Y.2d 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Memorandum: As Supreme Court properly determined in this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination that petitioner should participate in a sex offender treatment program, petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before commencing this proceeding. Thus, the court properly dismissed the petition (see Matter of Muniz v David, 16 AD3d 939, 939-940 [2005]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P, Smith, Fahey and Garni, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muniz v. David
16 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 1772, 890 N.Y.2d 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dudas-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2009.