Duda (Chet) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 2015·No. 69261·Unpublished

Opinion

An unpublis L order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123

SUPREME 6mm OF NEVADA

(0’; 194M

IN THE SUPREME COURT CIF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHET DUDA, NO. 69261 Appellant VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respmndent.

DEC l 5 2015

Tame e: LIMDEM» s CLERK? sumame irfimJum BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

DEPUTY C

This is a pro se appeal from a district caurt order denying a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Cmurt, Clark County; Valerie Adair, J udge.

Because 11:3 atatute or caurt rule permits; an appeal from the aferementioned decisicnj we lack jm‘isdictiun. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 84-9, 352; 792 P.2d 1133, 1185 (1990). Accerdingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

{z , *5 _,§~,_______m._, J ~

Pax‘raguirre

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District J udge Chet Duda Attorney General! Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District. Cum-t Clerk

15- S$l83

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duda (Chet) v. State, (Neb. 2015).

Duda (Chet) v. State (Duda (Chet) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)
Ballard v. Eighth Judicial District Court
787 P.2d 406 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)