Duda (Chet) v. State
Opinion
An unpublis L order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123
SUPREME 6mm OF NEVADA
(0’; 194M
IN THE SUPREME COURT CIF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CHET DUDA, NO. 69261 Appellant VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respmndent.
DEC l 5 2015
Tame e: LIMDEM» s CLERK? sumame irfimJum BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
DEPUTY C
This is a pro se appeal from a district caurt order denying a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Cmurt, Clark County; Valerie Adair, J udge.
Because 11:3 atatute or caurt rule permits; an appeal from the aferementioned decisicnj we lack jm‘isdictiun. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 84-9, 352; 792 P.2d 1133, 1185 (1990). Accerdingly, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
{z , *5 _,§~,_______m._, J ~
Pax‘raguirre
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District J udge Chet Duda Attorney General! Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District. Cum-t Clerk
15- S$l83
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duda (Chet) v. State (Duda (Chet) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.