Duda (Chet) v. State
This text of Duda (Chet) v. State (Duda (Chet) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An unpublis L order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123
SUPREME 6mm OF NEVADA
(0’; 194M
IN THE SUPREME COURT CIF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CHET DUDA, NO. 69261 Appellant VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respmndent.
DEC l 5 2015
Tame e: LIMDEM» s CLERK? sumame irfimJum BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
DEPUTY C
This is a pro se appeal from a district caurt order denying a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Cmurt, Clark County; Valerie Adair, J udge.
Because 11:3 atatute or caurt rule permits; an appeal from the aferementioned decisicnj we lack jm‘isdictiun. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 84-9, 352; 792 P.2d 1133, 1185 (1990). Accerdingly, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
{z , *5 _,§~,_______m._, J ~
Pax‘raguirre
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District J udge Chet Duda Attorney General! Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District. Cum-t Clerk
15- S$l83
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Duda (Chet) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duda-chet-v-state-nev-2015.