Ductless Hood Co. v. A & B Home Appliances, Inc.

317 F.2d 606
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 14, 1963
DocketNo. 343, Docket 27940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 317 F.2d 606 (Ductless Hood Co. v. A & B Home Appliances, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ductless Hood Co. v. A & B Home Appliances, Inc., 317 F.2d 606 (2d Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an action for infringement of U. S. Patent 2,886,124, for a “kitchen conditioner,” issued to George A. Scharmer on May 12, 1959, the district court sustained the defense of lack of invention over the prior art, specifically the Sonntag patent (U. S. Patent 2,369,375), and dismissed the complaint. The advancement claimed by the plaintiffs for their “invention” is the relocation of air outlets from the top to the front of a kitchen exhaust hood. If the top of the hood is to be covered by cabinets — the situation for which plaintiffs’ product was designed — the obvious answer is moving the louvres. This hardly shows invention. Thus, we accept the findings of District Judge Dooling and affirm on his persuasive opinion, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 210 F. Supp. 57.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 F.2d 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ductless-hood-co-v-a-b-home-appliances-inc-ca2-1963.