Ducournau v. Levistones

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ducournau v. Levistones

4 La. Ann. 30

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1849

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 4 La. Ann. 30 (Ducournau v. Levistones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ducournau v. Levistones, 4 La. Ann. 30 (La. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

The Code of Practice is positive that if the appellant does not file the transcript seasonably, tbe appeal shall be considered as abandoned, and the appellant shall not be afterwards allowed to renew it. C. P. 594, 4 La. 41.

The omission is attributed by the appellant to the fault of his attorney. We stated, on a former occasion, that this could not be recognized as a ground of relief. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasons then given. See same case 3 An. p. 245. Appeal dismissed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

The Code of Practice is positive that if the appellant does not file the transcript seasonably, tbe appeal shall be considered as abandoned, and the appellant shall not be afterwards allowed to renew it. C. P. 594, 4 La. 41.

The omission is attributed by the appellant to the fault of his attorney. We stated, on a former occasion, that this could not be recognized as a ground of relief. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasons then given. See same case 3 An. p. 245. Appeal dismissed,.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 La. Ann. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ducournau-v-levistones-la-1849.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack