Ducournau v. Levistones
4 La. Ann. 30
Opinion
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
The Code of Practice is positive that if the appellant does not file the transcript seasonably, tbe appeal shall be considered as abandoned, and the appellant shall not be afterwards allowed to renew it. C. P. 594, 4 La. 41.
The omission is attributed by the appellant to the fault of his attorney. We stated, on a former occasion, that this could not be recognized as a ground of relief. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasons then given. See same case 3 An. p. 245. Appeal dismissed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ducournau v. Levistones, 4 La. Ann. 30 (La. 1849).
4 La. Ann. 30 (Ducournau v. Levistones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamilton v. Dabbs
44 So. 2d 896 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
Gazzo v. Bisso Ferry Co.
174 So. 132 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Mundy v. Phillips
102 So. 519 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1924)
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
53 So. 582 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)
Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R.
40 So. 525 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)