Duckworth v. Diggles

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Duckworth v. Diggles

29 N.E. 221, 139 Mass. 51, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 17

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedFebruary 26, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 N.E. 221 (Duckworth v. Diggles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duckworth v. Diggles, 29 N.E. 221, 139 Mass. 51, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 17 (Mass. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

Although the course taken by the referee appears to have been irregular, the evidence was sufficient to warrant the finding of the presiding judge, that the defendant had waived any objections thereto, by going on with the hearing after knowledge thereof; and, upon that finding, the case falls within the principle of Fox v. Hazelton, 10 Pick. 275, and Kent v. Charlestown, 2 Gray, 281. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. Allen, J.

Although the course taken by the referee appears to have been irregular, the evidence was sufficient to warrant the finding of the presiding judge, that the defendant had waived any objections thereto, by going on with the hearing after knowledge thereof; and, upon that finding, the case falls within the principle of Fox v. Hazelton, 10 Pick. 275, and Kent v. Charlestown, 2 Gray, 281. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.E. 221, 139 Mass. 51, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duckworth-v-diggles-mass-1885.

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack