Duckworth v. Diggles
29 N.E. 221, 139 Mass. 51, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 17
Opinion
C. Allen, J.
Although the course taken by the referee appears to have been irregular, the evidence was sufficient to warrant the finding of the presiding judge, that the defendant had waived any objections thereto, by going on with the hearing after knowledge thereof; and, upon that finding, the case falls within the principle of Fox v. Hazelton, 10 Pick. 275, and Kent v. Charlestown, 2 Gray, 281. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duckworth v. Diggles, 29 N.E. 221, 139 Mass. 51, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 17 (Mass. 1885).
29 N.E. 221 (Duckworth v. Diggles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Teter v. Moore
93 S.E. 342 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1917)
Hoffman v. Westlecraft
89 A. 1006 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1914)