Duckett v. State

191 S.W.2d 879, 149 Tex. Crim. 100, 1946 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 681
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 23, 1946·No. No. 23229.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

At a former day of this term of court an opinion was handed down reversing this causé. The State filed a motion for rehearing. Upon consideration of this motion, the former opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted in lieu thereof :

The appeal is from a conviction on a charge of assault to rape.

The record before us, as certified by the trial judge, shows that at the time of the commission of the alleged offense, the prosecutrix was the wife of the appellant. Ordinarily a husband ‘cannot be guilty of assault with intent to rape his wife. Frazier v. State, 86 S. W. 754.

Because no violation of law is shown, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded. The State’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckett v. State, 191 S.W.2d 879, 149 Tex. Crim. 100, 1946 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 681 (Tex. 1946).

191 S.W.2d 879 (Duckett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rozell v. State
502 S.W.2d 16 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)