Duckett v. State

737 S.W.2d 472, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4517
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 4, 1987·No. No. 52542·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate judgment and sentence. We find no error and that the decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. A written opinion would serve no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckett v. State, 737 S.W.2d 472, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4517 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

737 S.W.2d 472 (Duckett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.