Duckett v. New York Presbyterian Hospital

130 A.D.3d 473, 14 N.Y.S.3d 10
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 2015
Docket15623 114004/10
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 130 A.D.3d 473 (Duckett v. New York Presbyterian Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duckett v. New York Presbyterian Hospital, 130 A.D.3d 473, 14 N.Y.S.3d 10 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

*474 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered October 23, 2014, which denied defendant hospital’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Issues of fact exist as to whether the hospital unlawfully terminated petitioner’s employment because of her disability. There is evidence in the record that plaintiff was suffering from a mental illness that was affecting her job performance before the hospital terminated her employment. There is also evidence that hospital employees, including plaintiff’s supervisor, were aware of her physical and mental health issues shortly before she took medical leave, and that her supervisor was concerned about her fitness to work upon her return (compare Hazen v Hill Betts & Nash, LLP, 92 AD3d 162 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 812 [2012] [determination that employer unlawfully discriminated against employee was not supported by substantial evidence where there was no evidence that the petitioner was suffering from a mental illness or that the employer knew, before it terminated the petitioner’s employment, that the petitioner was disabled by his alleged disorder or that the disorder limited his performance]).

Plaintiff is not estopped from asserting her discrimination claims under the State and City Human Rights Laws. Her application for, and receipt of, federal and state-disability benefits is not inconsistent with her claims (Cleveland v Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 US 795 [1999]). Further, the hospital has not established, as a matter of law, that plaintiff could not have performed her job duties with a reasonable accommodation. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Renwick, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Emblem Health Servs.
2018 NY Slip Op 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D.3d 473, 14 N.Y.S.3d 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duckett-v-new-york-presbyterian-hospital-nyappdiv-2015.