Duckett v. Hofferberth
160 A.D. 871, 144 N.Y.S. 952
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We think that the plaintiff failed to sustain a cause of action for malicious prosecution. So far as any prosecution was instituted by the defendant the plaintiff failed to show a lack of probable cause, and the complaint should have been dismissed. Under such circumstances the court is not required to reverse a verdict for the plaintiff for one cent. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duckett v. Hofferberth, 160 A.D. 871, 144 N.Y.S. 952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
160 A.D. 871 (Duckett v. Hofferberth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Liffman v. Booke
59 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)