Duckett v. Duckett
This text of 337 S.E.2d 759 (Duckett v. Duckett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[280]*280Opinion
This is an appeal arising out of a contempt order in the Washington County Circuit Court case of Commonwealth v. Billy Gene Duckett. Appellant, Raye Margaret Sluder Duckett, Mr. Duckett’s former wife, asserts that she is aggrieved by a portion of the Circuit Court’s order which excused Mr. Duckett from paying accrued arrearages in child and spousal support and maintenance, and reduced the amount of future payments.
Appellant has filed no appeal bond as required by Code § 8.01-876.1 and Rule 5A:17. Consequently, we are unable to reach the merits of this case and must dismiss the appeal.
Code § 8.01-676.1(A) provides: “A party filing a notice of an appeal of right to the Court of Appeals shall simultaneously file an appeal bond in the penalty of $500.” The bond must be filed with the clerk of the Industrial Commission or the clerk of the Circuit Court, whichever is applicable. Code § 8.01-676.1(1).
The Supreme Court has recently reiterated its long-standing position that failure to file the appeal bond in the Supreme Court is jurisdictional and that such failure is not a mere defect which may be corrected pursuant to its Rule 5:24. Rudiger & Sons, Inc. v. Hanckel-Smith Sales Co., _ Va. _, 335 S.E.2d 257 (1985).
The appeal bond required by statute and the rules applicable to their filing are substantially the same in the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. This court has so held. Burns v. C.W. Wright Construction Co., 1 Va. App. 256, _ S.E.2d _ (1985).
We hold that the failure to file the appeal bond as required by Code § 8.01-676.1 requires that this appeal be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Baker, J., and Moon, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 S.E.2d 759, 1 Va. App. 279, 1985 Va. App. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duckett-v-duckett-vactapp-1985.