Duck v. State ex rel. Dill

17 Ind. 210, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 358
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Ind. 210 (Duck v. State ex rel. Dill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duck v. State ex rel. Dill, 17 Ind. 210, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 358 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Mary Jane Dill caused a prosecution to be instituted against Robert Duel', for bastardy. Mary had given birth to her child. It was born on September 18, 1858; December 18, 1857, would have been nine months previous. On the trial, the defendant offered to prove that Mary Jane- had had sexual intercourse with another person, in the first-week of November, 1857.

We think the Court rightly rejected the evidence. It is true, experience proves that the period of gestation is almost as variable in individual cases, though within narrow limits, as that of' the length of human life; but the longest [211]*211period we have ever known to be judicially allowed, was 313 days. See the case of The Commonwealth v. Hoover, Lewis’ U. S. Cr. Law, p. 48. In the case at bar, the evidence proposed might have covered a period of 322 days.

JD. S. Major, for the appellant.

Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed, with 10'per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Pickle v. Phillips
31 N.E. 476 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Ind. 210, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duck-v-state-ex-rel-dill-ind-1861.