Ducheneau v. Hiram House

4 Utah 483
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ducheneau v. Hiram House. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Utah 363
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1886·Published

Opinion

Boreman, J.:

The petition for rehearing states no new facts or grounds for a reversal of the judgment of the lower court. It is mainly a reargumént of the case. We have repeatedly called attention to the fact that no rehearing will ■ be granted where nothing new and important is offered for our consideration. We again say that we cannot grant a rehearing unless a strong showing- therefor be made. A reargument or an argument, with the court upon the points of the decision, with no new light given, is not such a showing..

The rehearing is denied.

Powers, J., concurred. Zane, C. J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ducheneau v. Hiram House, 4 Utah 483 (Utah 1886).

4 Utah 483 (Ducheneau v. Hiram House) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.