Ducharme v. State

686 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1927, 1996 WL 86795
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1996
DocketNo. 94-02874
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 7 (Ducharme v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ducharme v. State, 686 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1927, 1996 WL 86795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kimberly A. Ducharme appeals her conviction and sentence for aggravated child abuse. We affirm the conviction without discussion. We also affirm the sentence for the reason discussed below.

Ducharme contends that the trial court erred in modifying her sentence to include jail time as a condition of community control. This sentence modification occurred about ten days after the defendant filed a notice of appeal from the original judgment and sentence. Thus, the modification is not part of the sentence on appeal. Because no error is claimed as to the original sentence, we affirm.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1927, 1996 WL 86795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ducharme-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.