Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Roberts

1955 OK 330, 290 P.2d 138, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 578
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 15, 1955·No. No. 36315·Published

Opinion

HALLEY, Justice.

Plaintiff obtained a judgment in the trial court against the defendant from which defendant appealed by petition in error and case-made and on July 8, 1954, filed its brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstnces as stated by‘ this Court in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okl. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the duty of this Court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court but-the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

JOHNSON, C. J. and CORN, DAVI-SON, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and HUNT, JJ., concur'. ■ WILLIAMS, V. C. J., concurs in reversal, dissents as to rendition of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Roberts, 1955 OK 330, 290 P.2d 138, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 578 (Okla. 1955).

1955 OK 330 (Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gooldy v. Hines
1940 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)