DUBRIWNY v. McQueen
721 N.W.2d 193, 477 Mich. 868
This text of 721 N.W.2d 193 (DUBRIWNY v. McQueen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DUBRIWNY v. McQueen, 721 N.W.2d 193, 477 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
David DUBRIWNY and Karen L. Dubriwny, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
William C. McQUEEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Colton v. Nandamudi
721 N.W.2d 193 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
721 N.W.2d 193, 477 Mich. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubriwny-v-mcqueen-mich-2006.